Pick the protocol you can repeat well
Choose the test you actually completed: a hard 20-minute effort, Zwift's progressive ramp test, or the CTS field test of two eight-minute efforts separated by 10 minutes of easy spinning. Results from different protocols are not perfectly interchangeable.
- Use a calibrated power source and the same bike or trainer for comparisons.
- Arrive rested and complete the protocol-specific warm-up.
- Record the required average power, not normalized power or a short peak.
Understand the arithmetic
The selected protocol displays its multiplier before you calculate. A 260 W 20-minute effort estimates 247 W because 260 × 0.95 = 247. A Zwift ramp with 350 W best one-minute power estimates 263 W after 350 × 0.75 = 262.5 and whole-watt rounding.
For the CTS field test, enter both eight-minute efforts; the calculator uses the higher average power and multiplies it by 0.90. W/kg is estimated FTP divided by body mass in kilograms, so changing metric or imperial display does not change the represented ratio.
Individual anaerobic contribution can make a fixed multiplier too high or too low. The most useful FTP estimate is one that produces realistic, repeatable training zones and tracks consistently over time.
Use FTP as a training anchor
Set zones from the estimate, then validate them in training. If threshold intervals are repeatedly impossible while recovery and fueling are adequate, the estimate may be too high. Retest with the same protocol after a training block or when workouts clearly stop matching the current anchor.